Family on Government and vice versa Essay

As distant as the political sciences functions go, it is the unit of the family that is equal to gain the nigh benefits. I lot the family as the most(prenominal) basic and the most unprotected aspect of union. It is the brasss ability to provide regulations, guidelines, and protection that the family is capable to continue its development. It strength be raised at this point that the person should be considered the most unprotected unit of association. However, I persist in be populateving that it is the family. The individual canister dummy up become a member of larger societal units.In fact, the individual can flush go so far as to become a member of political relation. It is because of this fact that the collection of individuals called the family is the most in need of the services offered by the government that presides over it. However, thither argon course of actions of government wherein it is the family that comprises it. In oligarchies and monarchies, for ex ample, the royal family comprises the governmental unit. It is in these cases that the interaction is reduced to one of family with family, of opinion distinguish family with non-ruling tell apart family, of bourgeois family with overturn class family.This can excessively be likened to the type of interaction describe to endure between the family and the confederacy to which it belongs. In other counsels, the family is also able to affect the government. Because the family forms the entirety of fiat and because it is able to mirror the mechanisms of society, it is also able to mirror and spread the mechanisms of government. The family is in charge of the education of the younger contemporaries with regards to the mights of the government, the need to follow the impositions of the government, and also the specific laws and regulations set forth by the constitution.The task of propagating the ethics and morals of a good citizen that obeys the government lie on the shoulder s of the members of the family. The concepts of restriction of behavior, meting punishments for unacceptable actions, and of obeying authority figures atomic number 18 also first understood by the child in the confines of the family. (Hegel, 2001) Society on Government and vice versa The government is said to be the regulating psychiatric hospital of society. It represents the majority of the population and provides frameworks as thoroughly as maintains peace and align.However, as I have stipulated, I believe that the inherent state in nature is peace and non war. Why then would a government be needed to maintain peace and order between its constituents and even with other governments? The state of war is not inherent in nature. However, it is also very practically present in observable society. Why is this so? I believe that war stems from the inability of society to fitting the unavoidably of its members. This is in accordance with the propositions of Habermas (1998). Bec ause of the societys inability to completely meet the needs of its members, there is unrest and turmoil.War and violent conflict rise up from these feelings of dissatisfaction. It is only through a strong index of the leave alone that dissatisfaction is allowed to exist in an individuals consciousness. I believe that the ineffective structuring of society creates feelings of unrest and dissatisfaction. When those with more ar attached more and those with less are asked for more, society is placed at an imbalance. This imbalance is unnatural. It is not the natural order of things. There is disequilibrium in society and as a result, there are individuals who are abused and unsatisfied.Again, this is also in accordance with the views of Marx and Engel (1978) regarding ruling class and non-ruling class. There is no chance for equilibrium or stability to be attained because as Marx and Engel (1978) stated, the ruling class practices hegemony. They use their ideologies to maintain po wer over the lower class. It is only with active revolt from the lower class that the structure of society can be changed. Thus war becomes an excerption to those whose dissatisfaction has become so great that they can no longer equal with it. Without the government, these feelings of dissatisfaction would reign crossways the world.There would, indeed, be numerous states of war across the globe. Peace would be hard to find and individuals would find it impossible to deliver the goods their true personal goals in life. A government is needed in order to regulate the interaction of the ruling class and the non-ruling class. Without the government, society would be in a constant flux of change and revolt. It is the institution of the government that allows society to remain its peace and as such to progress. However, it may well be the case that the government is simply a tool of the ruling class to maintain power, a means to their option of hegemony.This is exactly why even thoug h there are governments in place today, wars still occur. There is still a disequilibrium in the social structure. Also, the government is not representative of the majority. This is a fact stressed by Kant (1983) to be of the period importance in considering government models and systems utilized in a given state. There is, therefore, a type of government that will best treat the purposes of society and the individual. Although there are numerous forms of government, not all are adaptive to society and its members. The mode of government is a point of greater consideration than the type of sovereignty afforded.(Kant, 1983) Society, however, plays a greater role in government. It is more than just a place wherein the functions of government can be practiced. In fact, it is my belief that society and government act in much the same way that the President and the House of Congress act in a Republic government. That is that society and government act as checks and balances of indivi dually other. Although it is true that there is no clear definition of legal power that society has on a particular government in the way that government has on society it is also true that the dominant form of politics in a state are defined by society.Because most governments rely on societys good will towards it, society is able to check and balance the processes of the government. In modes of government involving votation, society dictates the candidates to be deemed more capable and reliable to place in position. This is through through the ideologies espoused by society. Thus two different political parties can be chosen from but the thrust of the resulting government will be based on the value systems established by society on its members.For modes of government, on the other, hand that do not include an electoral system, society is able to operate as a larger checks and balances system. Because monarchies and oligarchies and other mistakable forms of government give the r uler the right to decree laws and statutes by himself, society plays a crucial role. Social agreement or social rejection may be the only difference between a rulers decree of implementing the death penalty, for example, as a punishment to a dread(a) crime. Thus we see that society plays a large role in defining government actions even in these individualistic or familial forms of governance.On this point, however, the revision and reconsideration of laws in systems with electoral systems and with more conventional methods of passing laws is also highly dependent on societys moral and ethical stand. The three-strike law for example, wherein criminals convicted of a crime three measure receive a heavier sentence or a longer impoundment period, was not revised because the constituents of the State of California did not agree to the cookery that only severe crimes would be subject to this law.